Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago #224 closed defect (wontfix)Bug regarding the tiles parameter coding in PPS & SPS
Description
The implementation of the PPS and SPS syntax for tiles does not correctly reflect the syntax adopted in JCTVC-F335. Attachments (1)Change History (7)comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by shilin.xucomment:2 Changed 13 years ago by davidf
Updating component after adding WD (Text) tickets comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by davidf
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by davidf
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by ksuehring
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by ksuehring
It seems we forgot this patch. The syntax has been changed in HM 6.1 and will be revised in 7.x.
I guess the issues will be fixed with that. Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
The implementation of the PPS and SPS syntax in HM4.0-dev for tiles does not correctly reflect the syntax adopted in JCTVC-F335. Below, we show the difference between the HM code and the correct syntax from JCTVC-F335 for the SPS. The syntax differences for the PPS are exactly the same.
A code fragment from SPS in the HM:
uniform_spacing_idc
tile_boundary_independence_idc
num_tile_columns_minus1
num_tile_rows_minus1
if (uniform_spacing_idc == 0) {
}
The syntax defined in JCTVC-F335 is:
num_tile_columns_minus1
num_tile_rows_minus1
if (num_tile_columns_minus1 != 0 ll num_tile_rows_minus1 != 0) {
}