Opened 13 years ago Closed 12 years ago #431 closed defect (fixed)Missing initial value for candIntraPredModeB and candIntraPredModeA
Description
(actual version dK)
– If candIntraPredModeB is equal to candIntraPredModeA, the following applies:
candIntraPredModeB and candIntraPredModeA have no initial values, suppose candIntraPredModeN is equal to intraPredModeN but need to be described in text. Change History (4)comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by DefaultCC Plugin
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by tktancomment:3 Changed 13 years ago by tktan
Also it would seem that "prev_intra_pred_flag[ xB ][ yB ]" in Step 6 of Subclause 8.4.1 has already been changed to "prev_intra_luma_pred_flag[ xB ][ yB ]". comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by bbross
Fixed in JCTVC-I1003_d9. Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
Why do we need both candIntraPredModeN and intraPredModeN
Why don't we just replace "intraPredMode" with "candIntraPredMode" in the subclause 4 above.
Looking a little further down to subclause 6. 1) i., ii. and iii.
Why don't we just describe this step as
1) The elements of the list candModeList are sorted such that candModeList[x] < candModeList[x+1], for x=0 to 1.
In the second clause 6. 2) steps ii. to iv. are just a repeat of the same action.
It is better to replace it with a single “for loop”.
2) IntraPredMode[xB][yB] is derived as the following ordered steps: