Opened 12 years ago

Closed 12 years ago

#814 closed defect (fixed)

relative pixel location in edge filtering process calculated from absolute pixel location

Reported by: jbrandenburg Owned by: bbross
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: Text Version: D9 (K1003) v4
Keywords: Cc: benjamin.bross@…, bbross, wjhan, jct-vc@…


In section the luma location (xDk, yDm) is computed by: "yDm set equal to yC+( m << 3 ), m = 0..nD − 1" and "xDk set equal to xC + ( k << 2 ), k = 0..nD*2 − 1". In the following text (xDk, yDm) is used as relative luma location to the top left sample of the current luma coding block. Therefore the addition of (xC, yC) should be removed in the above equations.
The same mismatch can be found in the calculation of the relative chroma position in the same section and the relative luma/chroma positions for the horizontal filtering process in section

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by DefaultCC Plugin

  • Cc bbross wjhan jct-vc@… added

comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by bbross

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.

This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket.

These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant

  • Benjamin Bross(Owner, Subscriber, Participant)
  • jct-vc@…(Subscriber)
  • karl.sharman@…(Always)
  • Karsten Suehring(Always)
  • Woo-Jin Han(Subscriber)