Opened 13 years ago Closed 12 years ago #413 closed defect (fixed)Missing condition for Eq. (7-24) in calculation of Log2MinCUDQPSize
Description
In the semantics of max_cu_qp_delta_depth, the variable Log2MinCUDQPSize is calculated as in Eq. (7-24) only when max_cu_qp_delta_depth is greater than 0. However, this condition is missing in the current CD text.
In addition, a typo in “Its a requirement of bitstream conformance …” should be replaced by “It is a requirement of bitstream conformance …”. Change History (4)comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by DefaultCC Plugin
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by bbross
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by bbross
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by bbross
Fixed in JCTVC-I1003 d4. Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
I don't see a reason why Log2MinCUDQPSize should be conditioned on max_cu_qp_delta_depth>0. This does not changes the normative behavior.
In HLS text of d7, max_cu_qp_delta_depth is renamed to diff_cu_qp_delta_depth and “Its a requirement of bitstream conformance …” is removed. Furthermore, all occurrences of log2MinCUDQPSize should be renamed to Log2MinCUDQPSize.