Opened 8 years ago Closed 6 years ago #1454 closed enhancement (fixed)ambiguous formula
Description
The (8-5) is:
If reader assumes arithmetic operations are of higher priority than bitwise &, line in C/C++, then formula contains somewhat strange PicOrderCntVal- PicOrderCntVal. Change History (5)comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 8 years ago by ykcomment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 8 years ago by kolya
There is one more possible issue.
It seems it is not possible (but me had not found any explicit constraint in the spec) to refer from POC=15 to POC=16 in a long-term sense, coz (8-5) will compute POC=0 as a reference, not 16.
Could you clarify is there any explicit text on this?
Replying to yk:
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by yk
Regarding the following:
"It seems it is not possible (but me had not found any explicit constraint in the spec) to refer from POC=15 to POC=16 in a long-term sense, coz (8-5) will compute POC=0 as a reference, not 16. Could you clarify is there any explicit text on this?"
The description is not clear to me. Could you explain in more detail? comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by bbross
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by bbross
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
Thanks! You are right, it should be corrected:
PicOrderCntVal & ( MaxPicOrderCntLsb − 1 ) should be changed to ( PicOrderCntVal & ( MaxPicOrderCntLsb − 1 ) )