Opened 9 years ago Closed 7 years ago #1448 closed enhancement (wontfix)offset_len_minus1 range
Description
The spec says that valid range for offset_len_minus1 is [0, 31]. At the same time, offset_len_minus1=0 means that there is a slice segment of 1 byte size (entry_point_offset_minus1 == 0). But this is not possible coz every slice segment should contain at least 9 bits according to the clause 9.3.2.6.
Thus the valid range for offset_len_minus1 should be described as [1, 31] and valid range for entry_point_offset_minus1 is [1, 232 - 1].
(on behalf of pavel.evsikov@…) Change History (3)comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 9 years ago by kiranmisracomment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 9 years ago by kolya
Replying to kiranmisra:
Here is following quotation from meeting notes:
JCTVC-L0116 High-level parallelism clean-ups [T. Lee, B. Choi (Samsung)]
But for now, even with "_minus1" added, entry_point_offset_minus1[ i ] cannot be lower than 1. comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by bbross
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
Note, this issue was explicitly discussed at the JCTVC L meeting.