Opened 9 years ago Last modified 5 years ago #1427 reopened enhancement(8-155) and (8-157) do not seem to be used
Description
In "8.5.3.2.7 Derivation process for motion vector predictor candidates" (pp.144 in H.265-201504),
Becasue the corresponding candidate has no chance of MV-scaling,
So, (8-155) and (8-157) can be removed.
Thanks. Change History (2)comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by bbross
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by bbross
In fact, (8-155) and (8-157) could be removed as refIdxB set in 3. used in 5. is set again in 5. because availableFlagLXB is re-initialized to 0 in 5. Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
The equations are in fact used, e.g. point 5. is still executed after 4. even when availableFlagLXB is equal to 1