Opened 8 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

#1165 closed task (invalid)

something about the inter prediction for spatial merging candidates

Reported by: charles.lee Owned by:
Priority: minor Milestone: HM-12.1
Component: HM Version: HM-12.0
Keywords: Cc: fbossen, ksuehring, davidf, jct-vc@…

Description


Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by DefaultCC Plugin

  • Cc fbossen ksuehring davidf jct-vc@… added

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by charles.lee

in the spec(04/2013) for page 119, as for the spatial merging candidates define,there are two follow condition:

When one or more of the following conditions are true, availableA1 is set equal to FALSE

  1. xPb >> Log2ParMrgLevel is equal to xNbA1 >> Log2ParMrgLevel and yPb >> Log2ParMrgLevel is equal to yNbA1 >> Log2ParMrgLevel.
  1. PartMode of the current prediction unit is equal to PART_Nx2N, PART_nLx2N, or PART_nRx2N, and partIdx is equal to 1

for the condition 1,i am confuse about it ? Why do it need such a restriction that it is related to Log2ParMrgLevel ?

for the condition 2,According to the spec 6.4.2, when the current prediction unit is equal to PART_Nx2N and partIdx is equal to 1, i find the sameCb is true ,
and consequently the availableA1 is set equal to TRUE.

so i have a doubt about the condition 2 ? Why do it also need such a restriction?

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by fbossen

  • Resolution set to invalid
  • Status changed from new to closed

This isn't a report about an issue in HM

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.

This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket.

These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant

  • charles(Reporter, Participant)
  • David Flynn(Subscriber)
  • Frank Bossen(Subscriber, Participant)
  • jct-vc@…(Subscriber)
  • karl.sharman@…(Always)
  • Karsten Suehring(Subscriber, Always)