harmonize requirement for access unit that follows end of sequence NAL unit and end of bitstream NAL unit
In 7.4.1.4.2,
It is a requirement of bitstream conformance that, when present, the next access unit after an access unit that contains an end of sequence NAL unit shall be an IDR access unit, a BLA access unit, or a CRA access unit.
It is a requirement of bitstream conformance that, when present, the next access unit after an access unit that contains an end of bitstream NAL unit shall be an IRAP access unit, which may be an IDR access unit, a BLA access unit, or a CRA access unit.
These two sentences uses slightly different wording (IRAP not present in first) to express the same restriction. It seems that the two sentences can be combined into one sentence like this:
It is a requirement of bitstream conformance that, when present, the next access unit after an access unit that contains an end of sequence NAL unit or an end of bitstream NAL unit shall be an IRAP access unit, which may be an IDR access unit, a BLA access unit, or a CRA access unit.
Change History (3)
Changed 9 years ago by DefaultCC Plugin
-
Cc
bbross wjhan jct-vc@… added
-
Resolution
set to fixed
-
Status
changed from new to closed
| This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant - Benjamin Bross(Owner, Subscriber, Participant)
- Dzung Hoang(Reporter)
- jct-vc@…(Subscriber)
- karl.sharman@…(Always)
- Karsten Suehring(Always)
- Woo-Jin Han(Subscriber)
- Ye-Kui Wang(Participant)
|
Good suggestion - done in the next version I am working on.