Opened 9 years ago Last modified 9 years ago #90 new defectthe inference of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1 is not correctly handled
Change history (7)comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by kenhuangcomment:2 Changed 9 years ago by kenhuang
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by kenhuang
num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[0][0] is inferred to be equal to 0.
However, assignment of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[h][0] is from OLS index comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by kenhuang
When vps_base_layer_internal_flag is equal to 1, the value of
num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[h][0] is inferred to be equal to NumLayersInIdList[ h ] -1 comment:5 follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 9 years ago by Vadim
Could you please verify the fix with the rev 1515? Thanks. comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 Changed 9 years ago by kenhuang
Replying to Vadim:
The line, comment:7 Changed 9 years ago by Vadim
Am I right looking into the following semantics? If so, it says NumLayersInIdList[ h ] − 1.
num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[ h ][ j ] plus 1 specifies the number of bitstream partitions for the j-th partitioning scheme of the h-th OLS. The value of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[ h ][ j ] shall be in the range of 0 to NumLayersInIdList[ OlsIdxToLsIdx[ h ] ] – 1, inclusive. When vps_base_layer_internal_flag is equal to 1, the value of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[ 0 ][ 0 ] is inferred to be equal to 0. The value of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[ h ][ 0 ] is inferred to be equal to NumLayersInIdList[ h ] − 1. Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets. | This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant
|
num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[0][0] is inferred to be equal to 0.
However, the variable of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[0][0] in SHM is not assigned to be zero when vps_base_layer_internal_flag is equal to 1
However, assignment of num_partitions_in_scheme_minus1[h][0] is from OLS index