- Timestamp:
-
Sep 11, 2013, 10:00:18 AM (12 years ago)
- Author:
-
charles.lee
- Comment:
-
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
v1
|
v2
|
|
1 | 1 | for example: |
2 | | POC: 20 21 22 |
3 | | RPS (POC, used_by_curr_pic_s0_flag): |
4 | | |
| 2 | '''RPS (POC, used_by_curr_pic_s0_flag): |
| 3 | |
| 4 | POC: 20 21 22 |
| 5 | |
5 | 6 | (19,0) (20,1) (21,0) |
6 | 7 | (16,1) (19,1) (20,1) |
7 | | (16,0) (16,1) |
8 | | |
| 8 | (16,0) (16,1)''' |
9 | 9 | RPS (delta_poc_s0, used_by_curr_pic_s0_flag) |
10 | 10 | delta_poc_s0 = (-1)x(delta_poc_s0_minus1 +1) |
… |
… |
|
19 | 19 | (19,1) |
20 | 20 | (16,0) |
21 | | the delta_poc_s0_minus1,for the entry i is 0,is the difference between the current(21) and 20,which value is 1 |
22 | | when the entry i is 1,i think the delta_poc_s0_minus1 is between the i(pic 19) and i-1(pic 20),so i think this method is contradiction with hevc specfication??? |
| 21 | the delta_poc_s0_minus1,for the entry i is 0,is the difference between the current(21) and picture 20,so the delta_poc_s0_minus1 value is 1, |
| 22 | when the entry i is 1(greater than 0),i think the delta_poc_s0_minus1 is between the i(pic 19) and i-1(pic 20),so i think this method is contradiction with hevc specfication??? |
| This list contains all users that will be notified about changes made to this ticket. These roles will be notified: Reporter, Owner, Subscriber, Participant - Adarsh Krishnan Ramasubramonian(Participant)
- charles(Reporter, Participant)
- David Flynn(Subscriber)
- Frank Bossen(Subscriber, Participant)
- jct-vc@…(Subscriber)
- karl.sharman@…(Always)
- Karsten Suehring(Subscriber, Always)
|