Custom Query (1442 matches)
Results (52 - 54 of 1442)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#332 | fixed | Numerous references to "macroblock" | bbross | thomasd |
Description |
A number of concepts are still defined in terms of a "macroblock". (Actual version _dK). |
|||
#333 | fixed | Minor text errors | bbross | thomasd |
Description |
(Actual version _dK) Section 6.5.2 does not appear in the contents 6.6 incorrectly references 6.5.1 instead of 6.5.3 7.4.10 Residual coding semantics. Paras 3, 4, 5, 6 should all begin “... specifies ...” (singular) not “... specify..” (plural) as per significant_coeff_group_flag (para 7) 7.4.10 para 2 incorrectly references 6.5.1 instead of 6.6 |
|||
#336 | fixed | Mismatch of main profile and San Jose decision on E/Slice | bbross | felix.henry |
Description |
In San Jose, plenary discussion on the BoG report JCTVC-0738 decided that entropy slice are not allowed in main profile, but current statement in WD text (H1003_dK) is
so Entropy Slice are still allowed when single tile is used. Suggested modification by Ye-Kui: Keep the above sentence in the semantics of entropy_slice_flag (since multiple tiles and Entropy Slice have been made mutually exclusive anyway as per JCTVC-H0513), and add the following bullet item in the profile definition:
|