id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
969	Binarization of coeff_abs_level_remaining	eugene.kuznetsov	bbross	"The description of binarization of coeff_abs_level_remaining in the specification is confusing and ambiguous. 

I propose replacing the last three paragraphs of 9.2.2.8 with the following text.

""The binarization of coeff_abs_level_remaining consists of a prefix part and a suffix part. 

The prefix part of the binarization is derived by invoking the TU binarization process as described in subclause 9.2.2.2 with Min( 4, coeff_abs_level_remaining[ n ] >> cRiceParam ) as input and cMax=4.

When coeff_abs_level_remaining[n] is greater or equal to cTRMax, the suffix bin string is derived using the EGk binarization as specified in subclause 9.2.2.4 for the suffix part ( coeff_abs_level_remaining[ n ] − cTRMax ) with the Exp-Golomb order k set equal to cRiceParam + 1.

Otherwise, the suffix string is cRiceParam bit long and it is specified by the binary representation of coeff_abs_level_remaining[ n ] − ( (coeff_abs_level_remaining[ n ] >> cRiceParam ) << cRiceParam ).""

I've checked this logic against reference software and I believe it to be accurate.
"	enhancement	closed	minor		Text	D10 (L1003) v2	fixed		bbross wjhan jct-vc@…