id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
838	About vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag related syntax	conrad.ho	bbross	"The spec said ""vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag equal to 1 specifies that vps_max_dec_pic_buffering[ i ], vps_max_num_reorder_pics,  and  vps_max_latency_increase[ i ]  are  present  for vps_max_sub_layers_minus1 + 1  sub-layers"".

Thus the syntax is wrong.
Current: 
for( i = ( vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag ?    vps_max_sub_layers_minus1 : 0 ); i <= vps_max_sub_layers_minus1; i++ )
Correction:
for( i = ( vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag ? '''0 : vps_max_sub_layers_minus1''' ); i <= vps_max_sub_layers_minus1; i++ )
"	defect	closed	minor		Text	D9 (K1003) v4	duplicate		bbross wjhan jct-vc@…