id summary reporter owner description type status priority milestone component version resolution keywords cc 838 About vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag related syntax conrad.ho bbross "The spec said ""vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag equal to 1 specifies that vps_max_dec_pic_buffering[ i ], vps_max_num_reorder_pics, and vps_max_latency_increase[ i ] are present for vps_max_sub_layers_minus1 + 1 sub-layers"". Thus the syntax is wrong. Current: for( i = ( vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag ? vps_max_sub_layers_minus1 : 0 ); i <= vps_max_sub_layers_minus1; i++ ) Correction: for( i = ( vps_sub_layer_ordering_info_present_flag ? '''0 : vps_max_sub_layers_minus1''' ); i <= vps_max_sub_layers_minus1; i++ ) " defect closed minor Text D9 (K1003) v4 duplicate bbross wjhan jct-vc@…