Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #105

Timestamp:

11 Aug 2015, 14:05:59 (9 years ago)

Author:

ksuehring

Comment:

Split into two reports.

Gerhard told me, that he can confirm the issue remaining in this report.

Ticket #105 – Description

@@ -1 @@
-'''Potential Bug1：'''  
-   layer_set_idx_for_ols_minus1[i] code length calculation diff between spec description and HTM code implementation
- 
-Bug description:
-    This syntax use u(v) to code.
-    Spec description: code length should be Ceil(Log2(NumLayerSets - 1))
-    HTM implementation:   Ceil(Log2(NumLayerSets ))
+This syntax use u(v) to code.
+- Spec description: code length should be Ceil(Log2(NumLayerSets - 1))
+- HTM implementation:   Ceil(Log2(NumLayerSets ))
+
 Influence:
-    VPS high level syntax
-    We can always handle this potential problem due to SW implementation, no HW related. 
+- VPS high level syntax
 
-
-
-
-
-'''Potential Bug2:''' 
-• Inter-view bi-prediction mismatch with identicalMotion Mismatch case conditions:
-  V2 are bi-predicted from V0 and V1.    (V0->V2<-V1)
-  No Weighted Bi prediction is used.
-  Forward MV0 is equal to backward MV1.
-  RefPOCL0 is equal to RefPOCL1
-Influence:
-  2 views beyond (such as 3 views)
-  If we only target 2 views, we can ignore this potential bug.
+We can always handle this potential problem due to SW implementation, no HW related.